Good gamblers and other studies
The scientific world does not need to prove the manifestations of excitement in representatives of the species homo sapiens. A person himself proves his addiction to gambling in practice, losing millions of dollars. But what is the attitude to gambling in the rest of the animal world?
A very interesting study was conducted at the max Planck Institute for psycholinguistics. In the main scientific education of Germany in Berlin tested for the ability to play monkeys. The primates were offered a choice: take a small fruit, which they will get exactly, or try their luck.
The trick was that if the Primate chose the “gambling” option, it would lose the opportunity to get a small fruit. At the same time, knowing that there is a big one, he agreed to pass the tests. Scientists put out three plates, under one of which they hid this largest fruit, mixed the dishes and offered to choose. What was the disappointment of the first monkey, who did not solve the complex combination? After all, she has also lost the very small fruit that she would also have liked to eat.
To make sure that some monkeys, like humans, are subject to excessive excitement, and others are not so much, the researchers complicated the experiment. Now they asked primates who had already passed the test to choose between a small and large fruit 2 times. In the first case, all 3 cups hid a large fruit, in the second case, one of them was turned over.
Thus, the monkeys, mindful of their mistake, did not hesitate to grab the “tit in the hand” if all three cups were upside down. However, when one of the cups was turned over, the monkeys realized that their chances had increased, and they gave up the small fruit in favor of a lottery drawing the big one.
What about animal reactions?
A little later, in Oxford and McGill University, scientists using animal reactions were able to prove that gambling is not always harmful to humans. While some psychiatrists pointed out the importance of losing material and moral values, others pointed to their acquisition during the game. However, not in all cases. The main result of research was the statement that gambling does not increase stress, but on the contrary, removes it.
Who is Kyle Ziller?
Kyle Ziller, a student at the famous Cornell University, recently experimentally proved that winning a large number of hands in poker leads to more losses than winning a smaller number of hands. According to this study, the actual self-esteem after multiple small wins is less profitable than the rare, but accurate participation in the drawings of large banks.
What about loss of concentration?
One of the main factors that influence an unsuccessful online casino game is the constant loss of concentration due to external stimuli. Customers can devote themselves to casino games almost everywhere thanks to modern mobile devices. It has even reached the point that recent research has shown that on average, 10% of the time people spend on the Internet is spent playing online games. Perhaps social networks already have a serious competitor.
What Does World Prefer: Online Casinos or Physical Casinos?
There are a number of different laws regarding online casino sites, which are the exact…
Is Online Casino The Right Strategy Enough To Be Rich?
Nowadays, people want to make money and get rich in a short time without leaving…
Game in the online slots tournament
Online slots, like other online casino offers, have acquired many new features recently. One of…
Online Casino With A Minimum Deposit
When choosing a resource for gambling on the Internet, there are criteria that should be…
Best Casinos That Accept Cryptocurrency
Online Casino sites accepting payments with Bitcoin and giving casino bonuses are gradually increasing in…
Emotional casino player bankroll
Bankroll; this is the amount that the player has. In fact, this is money that…